forked from EduCraft/curriculum-project-hub
18aac1ff16
ADR-0001/0003/0004 已 PINNED 但 spec/System 未落,补三模块: - ProjectGroup: project↔飞书群 1:1 绑定 + 单射良构(ADR-0001);群失效态 OPEN - Memory: 锚点类别 + MCP 读上下文按 run/project 授权不变式(ADR-0003) - PermissionGrant: grant(resource×principal×role)+settings 六旋钮(ADR-0004); role-capability×settings-policy 组合规则 OPEN - Prelude: 新增 ChatId 载体 - ADR-0017: AgentSession provider/model 绑定,切 model 即新 session, 跨 session 连续性由 ADR-0003 记忆/锚点重建;agent 层 provider 无关, @Claude 仅为触发品牌。RunId/SessionId doc 去 provider 暗示。 lake build 28/28 绿。
48 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# ADR 0017: AgentSession Is Provider-Bound
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
Accepted.
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
ADR-0002 says a long-lived `AgentSession` can be reused by many runs, but never
|
|
addressed the provider/model dimension. The agent layer is provider-agnostic
|
|
(ADR-0001..0003 never required Claude specifically; the `@Claude` trigger name
|
|
is a product brand, not a provider commitment). In practice the Hub routes
|
|
model calls through an OpenAI-compatible client (e.g. OpenRouter), so a run may
|
|
target different models — and the motivation for multi-model is **role-based
|
|
routing**: drafting, reviewing, and triage suit different models.
|
|
|
|
That raises the question ADR-0002 left open: when a teacher switches model
|
|
mid-project, does the `AgentSession` carry live context across the switch, or
|
|
is it bound to a single provider/model?
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
An `AgentSession` is **provider/model-bound**. A model or provider switch
|
|
starts a new `AgentSession`. The `AgentSession` does not carry live context
|
|
across a switch.
|
|
|
|
Cross-session continuity is not the session's job — it is carried by ADR-0003's
|
|
project memory and anchors, which the Hub reads on demand when seeding a new
|
|
run. This keeps B consistent with ADR-0003 ("the Hub avoids becoming a full
|
|
chat history store"): session continuity and history continuity are the same
|
|
mechanism, both via memory/anchors, never via a live cross-provider session.
|
|
|
|
Per-run model selection (the run carries its model) is the switching point.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
- Switching model mid-project = new session; the new run seeds from project
|
|
memory/anchors (ADR-0003), not the prior session's live context.
|
|
- The agent layer is provider-agnostic: the agent loop is ours; model calls go
|
|
through an OpenAI-compatible client. No hard dependency on a single-vendor
|
|
agent SDK.
|
|
- Role-based model routing (different run kinds default to different models) is
|
|
a product/admin configuration concern, not a spec invariant.
|
|
- "AgentSession reused by many runs" (ADR-0002) holds *within* one
|
|
provider/model; it does not span a switch.
|
|
- The `@Claude` trigger name remains the product mention brand regardless of the
|
|
backing model.
|