Picture the whole framework, then pin the element-kind language layer. System platform layer — rebuild the semantics likec4 can't draw (ADR-0001..0004): - Prelude: opaque Identifiers carrier (ProjectId/RunId/SessionId/Principal) - System/Run: RunState + Terminal subset (set completeness left OPEN, no invented pending) - System/Lock: lock owner=run (typed), LockTable exclusivity, WellFormed invariant (a lock holder must be a non-terminal run — couples Lock and Run) - System/Permission: read<edit<manage role lattice, capability derivation, can_mono monotonicity theorem; force-release sits outside the lattice (admin-only) - System/Audit: intentionally thin (mostly plumbing, OPEN) Courseware product layer — split the single Lesson file into focused modules and fix doc tautology: Primitives / Element / Lesson / Render / Diagnostic, plus QuestionBank and Course skeletons (core relations OPEN, not invented). Diagnostic upgrades WarnsIgnored into a severity-tagged checker rule. Element schema + rich-content model (ADR-0006, ADR-0007): - docs/adr/0006: kind schema is declarative JSON Schema; field types are built-in scalars plus a `content` extension; a `content` value is typst source taken as module body; rich content must carry a VirtualPath (else click-to-jump and relative import break — verified against typst source); import boundary = within the engineering file + @package - docs/adr/0007: on-disk form is a real directory tree (agent/grep friendly); VirtualPath = real relative path; layout conventions deferred - spec/Courseware/RichContent: prose anchor for rich content (opaque VPath, RichContentRef); ElementData kept abstract — JSON/typst internals are implementation detail, not contract lake build green (18 jobs), no sorry, toolchain v4.31.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.2 KiB
ADR 0006: Element Schema Is Declarative, Rich Content Is Typst
Status
Accepted — for the decisions below. Several sub-decisions are deliberately left open; see Open Questions / Deferred.
Builds on ADR-0005, which fixed that an element instance = a kind tag + data conforming to that kind's schema, and that a kind's minimal contract to the framework is its data schema only. This ADR fixes how that schema is expressed and what the schema's "rich content" leaves actually are.
Context
ADR-0005 left the schema representation and the kind-definition mechanism as the largest OPEN items — and they are the foundation the rule-based checker stands on (the checker validates "does this data conform to its kind's schema?"). The domain is formula-heavy and content-structured: a worked example has a problem statement, options, a solution; a theorem has a statement, a proof, prerequisite lemmas. These fields are not bare strings — they are rich content.
Two facts about Typst were verified against its source
(/Users/sjfhsjfh/Typst/typst) and drive the decisions below:
- A
.typfile evaluates to aModulethat carries both ascopeof#letexports and a bodyContent(the rendered top-level markup).Contentretains aSpanthat resolves back to aFileId+ byte range, so click-to-jump from rendered content to source is possible. Contenthas noDeserialize; and Typst'sSource::newrequires aFileId. Source evaluated with a detached span loses its file identity:span.id()becomesNone(click-to-jump breaks) and a relativeimport "../x"fails with "cannot access file system from here". Relative imports and click-to-jump only work when the source is a real file (with aVirtualPath) in the compiler'sWorld.
Decision
The data schema is declarative — a JSON Schema
A kind declares its data shape as a declarative JSON Schema (field names, types, constraints), not as a program and not as a bespoke schema DSL. The checker reads the schema and validates instance data structurally against it. Whether stdlib kinds author their schema by hand-written JSON or via a host- language builder is an implementation detail, not part of this contract.
Field types: built-in scalars plus a content leaf type
Schema field types are the built-in scalars (string / number / boolean / enum /
list / object, as in ordinary JSON Schema) plus one extension type:
content. JSON Schema has no native notion of "typst content", so this is a
deliberate extension of JSON Schema (a custom type / format). Any
implementation must honor the same content extension rather than inventing its
own — this is the seam between the schema layer (A) and the rich-content layer.
A content value is a Typst source; its meaning is the module's body content
The value of a content field is a Typst source. Its denotation is the
body content of that source evaluated as a module (Typst's Module.content)
— not its #let exports. The canonical stored form is the source text, not
a serialized Content: Content cannot be deserialized and its spans are only
meaningful with the source present, so content is re-evaluated from source when
needed, never round-tripped as data.
Rich content is never free-floating — it has a virtual path
Because detached Typst source loses click-to-jump and cannot do relative
imports, a content value is not an anonymous text blob. It is a first-class
file in the compiler's World, carrying a virtual path. This is what makes
its spans resolve (click-to-jump) and its relative imports anchor. Concretely,
the engineering file constitutes a virtual file system with internal path
structure; each rich-content field sits at a path within it.
(This ADR commits only to "there is a path structure". Its concrete on-disk form — that the engineering file is a real directory tree — is fixed separately in ADR-0007. ADR-0006 does not assume the path structure is a disk directory.)
Import boundary: within the engineering file, plus packages
A relative import inside a rich-content source may resolve only to other paths
within the same engineering file's path structure (reusing definitions local
to this lesson), plus Typst @package ecosystem imports. It may not
reach into other engineering files. Cross-lesson reuse, if any, goes through a
separate mechanism (question bank / reuse — still OPEN, see ADR-0005 Deferred),
not through raw cross-file imports.
Consequences
- The checker can introspect a rendered
Content(its element type, fields, downcasts) to validate rich content beyond "is it present", and can use spans to point diagnostics back at the offending source location. - Canonical state is source text;
Contentis a transient product of evaluation. Storage, diffing, and agent edits all operate on source, not on serialized content. - Extending JSON Schema with
contentmeans conformance has a shared extension point: implementations align on onecontentsemantics instead of each inventing a rich-text encoding. - Rich content requiring a virtual path means the engineering file is inherently a path-structured container, not a bag of anonymous snippets — which is what ADR-0007 then grounds on disk.
- The import boundary keeps an engineering file self-contained: it depends only on itself and on published packages, never on a sibling lesson's internals.
Open Questions / Deferred
- Content element constraints (Y) — whether a
contentfield may be further constrained to admit only certain Typst element kinds (e.g. "inline only, no figure", "exactly one final expression"). Deferred: we will know which constraints are needed only once real stdlib kinds exist. Until then acontentfield means "a block of content", inner element shape unconstrained. - stdlib kind set — the first batch of framework-provided kinds and their individual schemas (each is later, per-kind work).
- JSON Schema dialect — which draft, and exactly which keywords are permitted in a kind schema (a subset/profile is likely, to keep the checker tractable). Not pinned here.
- On-disk form — fixed in ADR-0007 (directory tree); layout conventions (manifest, element ordering) deferred beyond that.