forked from bai/curriculum-project-hub
3a22669f0a
- spec/: freshly initialized Lean library project (lake init, v4.31.0), no deps - .gitea/workflows/spec-check.yml: CI running lake build on spec/ (well-formedness gate, not a spec-to-impl gate) - README.md: monorepo overview + the 5 "constitution" rules positioning spec/ as upstream semantic master - CLAUDE.md: global agent manual - spec/README.md: contract writing conventions (prose+type, PINNED/OPEN/ADR tags, no sorry) - docs/adr/0001-0004: system-level decision records (retrieved from main) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
ADR 0004: Use Feishu Docs-like Permission Grants
Status
Proposed.
Context
Project collaboration needs more nuance than a hard-coded owner / teacher / admin model. Teachers may need to view a project, discuss it, trigger Claude, edit artifacts, manage members, or handle exceptional cancellation. These are related but not identical privileges.
Feishu cloud docs separates collaborators from operation settings:
- collaborators can be users, groups, departments, user groups, apps, or wiki members;
- collaborator roles are read, edit, or manage;
- settings separately control sharing outside the organization, copying/downloading, commenting, and collaborator management.
That split maps well to Curriculum Project Hub.
Decision
Model project permissions as:
PermissionGrant
- resource_type: project | artifact | project_group
- resource_id
- principal_type: user | feishu_chat | department | user_group | app
- principal_id
- role: read | edit | manage
PermissionSettings
- resource_type
- resource_id
- external_share_policy
- comment_policy
- copy_download_policy
- collaborator_management_policy
- agent_trigger_policy
- agent_cancel_policy
Use role-derived capabilities for ordinary actions, and settings for policy knobs:
read: view project, artifacts, run history and project group metadata.edit: read plus discuss, comment, edit artifacts, trigger Claude runs and answer Claude choice cards.manage: edit plus manage collaborators, project settings, group binding and normal run cancellation policy.- admin-only override: force release stuck locks and perform exceptional audit operations.
Consequences
- We can grant access to a teacher, a whole Feishu project group, a department, or a custom user group using the same model.
- Claude invocation is explicit policy, not just "anyone in the group can run it" forever.
- "Who can cancel current processing" can be different from "who can force release a stuck lock".
- The model stays close to Feishu users' expectations without copying every Feishu-specific API detail.