forked from EduCraft/curriculum-project-hub
ymy
83a6b012b7
- FileLibRecentVisit 删表(手写迁移;表当日新建无生产数据) - recentService/recentRoutes/RecentView 删除;GridLibraryView 埋点与 navTarget 跳转一并移除;types 清 RecentEntry - 左栏保留 文件库/回收站(ADR-0031 回收站半部不受影响) - breadcrumb 的 role 字段保留(独立可用的增量字段)
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
ADR 0032: Remove The Recent-Visit Module
Status
Accepted. Supersedes the "Recent visits" half of ADR-0031 (the recycle-bin half is unaffected and remains in force).
Context
ADR-0031 (same day) introduced 最近打开: a FileLibRecentVisit table, client-driven
visit recording, and a rail entry in the teacher app. After seeing it live, the product
call is that the module is not wanted — it adds a tracking surface, a table, and rail
noise without a compelling teacher workflow behind it.
Decision
The recent-visit module is removed end-to-end:
FileLibRecentVisitis dropped (hand-written migration20260731090000_drop_filelib_recent_visit; the table was created the same day and held no production data).recentService/recentRoutes(/database/api/recent) and theRecentViewcomponent are deleted; the rail in/appkeeps only 文件库 / 回收站.GridLibraryViewvisit recording and thenavTargetnavigation entry go with it.- The
rolefield added to breadcrumb entries for ADR-0031 is kept — it is a cheap, additive field on an existing API and independent of the removed module.
If recent-visit tracking comes back as a requirement, it is a new decision (and should then define why client-driven tracking is worth its surface) rather than a revival of this one.