forked from EduCraft/curriculum-project-hub
chore: remove Lean spec; ADRs are the single source of truth
The spec/ Lean semantic master had no conformance gate, no codegen, and no CI tie to implementations — alignment was carried entirely by human review, the same mechanism that carries the ADRs. In practice the ADRs plus greppable code comments were already the load-bearing artifacts, so spec/ was the most expensive kind of stale documentation. - delete spec/ and the spec-check CI workflow - README: constitution rewritten around ADRs as decision truth - AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md: discipline re-anchored (new decisions -> new ADR, never rewrite ADR history; supersede instead) - code comments: re-anchor 'Mirrors Spec.X' invariants to ADR numbers (cph-diag, cph-check, cph-model, hub runner/capacity/org, prisma) - leave ADR bodies and .scratch audit snapshots untouched (history); fix live references in open readiness tickets
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: checker check
|
||||
|
||||
# Builds and lints the Rust implementation crates under crates/ (the rule-based
|
||||
# checker that "stands in Lean's position" at product runtime).
|
||||
# lesson checker).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Like spec-check, this is an INTERNAL gate on the implementation's own health
|
||||
# (does it build, pass its tests, satisfy clippy + rustfmt?). It is NOT a
|
||||
# spec-to-implementation conformance gate — implementations align to the Lean
|
||||
# contract by human review, not by CI. See the repo README.
|
||||
# This is an INTERNAL gate on the implementation's own health
|
||||
# (does it build, pass its tests, satisfy clippy + rustfmt?). There is no
|
||||
# decision-to-implementation conformance gate — implementations align to the
|
||||
# ADRs by human review, not by CI. See the repo README.
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user